Jason Maxiell comes off the bench and only plays about 14 minutes and averages 5 RPG. I’ve played about 20 games in my association now and Vucevic plays around 35 minutes and he averages only 6 RPG…my other post player is Tristan Thompson and he averages 11 RPG. But this dude does NOT rebound in the game.
He has a 75 overall rating which is pretty good, and he has high rebound ratings (A if I’m not mistaken). I like him a lot in the NBA, but in the game he’s terrible. I did a fantasy association and my center ended up being Nikola Vucevic. On paper the 80 rated player is obviously better in *most* categories, but in an actual game the guy with a 70 rating can still dominate an 80 if you know how to play the game in general. The difference of a player at 70 rating to 80 rating is honestly not that different.
I don’t agree with it, but honestly I don’t know why all the fuss. But it does seem the first shipment has some odd player ratings, it’s like they’re just assuming a few players are going to be a bit better than the previous season so they compensate for it. In two months some players get cut, picked up, etc. I was mostly referring to the inaccuracy of the rosters than the player ratings.
0 kommentar(er)
